Conflict and Technology - Who is to Blame - Man Or Machine?

We've all heard the saying "Guns don't kill people,understanding of how things are. Of course, my
people kill people!" So, with this statementgrandfather was a nuclear physicist, so, I am
extrapolated can we also apply it to othergood on that. The Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombs
technology advances that kill people? For instance;were unfortunate, but history agrees that it
Landmines do not kill people. Atomic Bombs doended the war and actually saved lives. And yes, I
not kill people. Automobiles do not kill people. Is itknow the victorious army always re-writes
the technology which is bad or the humanhistory, but it is a good point.
element we have to watch out for?The invention of the reciprocating engine is a
Not long ago a gentleman emailed into a thinkgreat way to get lots of power in a small motor.
tank after reading an article about Conflict andCoal, Kerosene, Oil, yes, all good, and it sure beats
Technology which essentially pointed a finger atburning wood to boil water to make steam to
mankind and their inherent problems and lethave an energy form you can use to do work,
technology off the hook for the deaths that itright? Are there better ways to do things, more
happened to cause. This gentleman asked threeefficient means of converting energy to the
simple questions. Indeed, perhaps we mightproper form to do work, sure there are and as
discuss them;mankind progresses and learns more, they'll figure
it out.
1. Would you say the splitting of the atom had aThere would be innovation in the surgical fields
good impact on society rather than a bad one?without all the other technologies, yes, I believe
2. Would you say that the discovery of fossil fuelthis to be true, but, I would submit to you that
and the advent of the combustible engine werethe combination is what really makes things fly.
worth "it"?Perhaps, this is why it is worthy to discuss Ray
3. Also, do you think we could have still had theKurzweil and his theories on the "Singularity" as
advancements in the surgical fields without any ofwhen you take computer science, bio-science,
the aforementioned?new materials, nano-technology, alternative
Okay, let me share with you some thoughtsenergy, and combine them all, well, wow!
from my perspective. First, I am pro-nuclearYou have a bunch of different areas of innovation
power. And I am pro-microwave ovens, even if Icoming together at once, thus Moore's Law
wouldn't want to cook a secret Cheese Cakeseems almost indefinite. The future comes,
recipe in one, they are great for many things. Itechnology is good. Now with that said will some
also like communicating on this little humanof this new technology be used to for war?
invention we call the Internet, ARPA predecessorUnfortunately, we know it will, but we must look
to DARPA. I like Jet Aircraft Travel too.back at history and note that technology built for
So, I'd say splitting of the Atom has led to manyconflict has considerably advanced the human
great innovations (energy as an example) andspecies in so many ways. So think on this.