Is Pasteurization More of a Health Risk or a Safety Benefit? Read this, then YOU Tell Us!

We're taught as early as elementary school aboutresults in losses of anywhere from zero to 10
the French chemist Louis Pasteur and his famouspercent for each of these, which most would
invention: pasteurization. This is the process ofconsider only a marginal reduction," says Sheehan.
heating food to kill bacteria, viruses, mold, yeastsFurther, "Pasteurization will destroy some
and other potentially harmful organisms. The firstenzymes," says Barbara Ingham, Ph.D., associate
pasteurization test was performed back in 1862,professor and extension food scientist at the
after Pasteur noticed that microorganisms couldUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison. "But the
contaminate beverages (he later extended this toenzymes that are naturally present in milk are
the theory that microorganisms could contaminatebovine enzymes. Our bodies don't use animal
humans and animals as well.). But pasteurization didenzymes to help metabolize calcium and other
not immediately become the gold standard fornutrients." The Case for Raw Milk On the other
milk production in the United States. In fact, atside of the fence are those who say
the end of the 19th century "swill dairies," in whichpasteurization is unnecessary if cows are raised in
cows were raised in horrible conditions andclean environments, and radically changes the
reportedly fed swill from liquor distilleries, were astructure of the milk, resulting in an entirely
major problem. The milk from these dairies wasdifferent, and potentially harmful, food. According
of such poor quality that it was thought to beto the Weston A. Price Foundation: "Pasteurization
contributing to the high death rate of urbandestroys enzymes, diminishes vitamin content,
infants at the time (the yearly death rate of U.S.denatures fragile milk proteins, destroys vitamins
infants in cities was about half of the yearly birthC, B12 and B6, kills beneficial bacteria, promotes
rate). Thus, a crusade began for certified rawpathogens and is associated with allergies,
(unpasteurized) milk, which would ensure certainincreased tooth decay, colic in infants, growth
purity levels of milk and regular inspections ofproblems in children, osteoporosis, arthritis, heart
dairies. "Though more and more milk was beingdisease and cancer. Calves fed pasteurized milk
pasteurized, pasteurization was seen by many asdo poorly and many die before maturity. Raw
a stopgap measure that would no longer bemilk sours naturally but pasteurized milk turns
needed once the production and distribution ofputrid; processors must remove slime and pus
milk was more carefully regulated. Certified milkfrom pasteurized milk by a process of centrifugal
was the model for the production of better milkclarification." Raw milk, proponents say, is an
everywhere," said Ron Schmid, ND, author of Theoutstanding source of beneficial bacteria such as
Untold Story of Milk. Yet by the early 20thlactobacillus acidolphilus, vitamins, enzmes and
century, milk supplies were still of poor quality,calcium. Further, they say that sickness resulting
and thought to be involved in many diseasefrom raw milk is rare--instead, it is pasteurized
outbreaks, leading authorities to push formilk that is often implicated in outbreaks of
mandatory pasteurization of all milk exceptfood-borne illness. According to Mark McAfee,
certified raw milk. "Not until the 1930s didfounder of Organic Pastures Dairy, which
commercial dairy interests, segments of theproduces a full line of raw organic dairy products
medical community, politicians and public healthfor retail sale, "During the period 2000 through
agency officials and their allies in the media begin a2004 there were several listeria-related food
campaign first to smear all raw milk and then torecalls in California associated with pasteurized milk
eliminate its availability and sale," Schmid said. Thusproducts and ice cream. During this same period
began the compulsory pasteurization of milk andmore than 12 million servings of Organic Pastures
the great debate that has spanned centuries: Isproducts were consumed and not one person
pasteurization one of the greatest discoveries, orcomplained of illness and not one pathogen was
greatest setbacks, of our time? The Case forever found either by the state, FDA or Organic
Pasteurization "[Drinking raw milk is] like playingPastures." Organic Pastures then hired a
Russian roulette with your health," says Johnlaboratory to perform an experiment. The lab
Sheehan, director of the Food and Drugadded 10 million counts of pathogens to
Administration's (FDA) Division of Dairy and Eggone-milliliter samples of organic raw milk and found
Safety. "We see a number of cases ofthat the pathogens not only would not grow but
food-borne illness every year related to thethey also died off. The lab concluded: " ... Organic
consumption of raw milk." According to the FDA,raw milk and colostrum do not appear to support
raw milk may contain any number ofthe growth of pathogens ..." As it stands, the sale
disease-causing organisms, includingof raw milk across state lines is illegal. However,
campylobacter, escherichia, listeria, salmonella,sales of raw milk, either in retail stores or directly
yersinia and brucella. Aside from causing acutefrom the farm, are legal within 28 U.S. states. In
diarrhea, stomach cramps, vomiting and fever,other states, raw milk may be available through
these organisms may also cause more seriouscow "leasing" programs in which members
conditions, particularly among the elderly, pregnantpurchase shares of a cow and can then use the
women, children or those with weakened immunemilk how they choose. l"> Please Let Us Know
systems. The FDA says pasteurization helpsWhat YOU Think! Select answers will be published
prevent: Tuberculosis Diphtheria Polio Salmonellosisin the forthcoming issue of the e-newsletter!*
Strep throat Scarlet fever Typhoid fever Milk can*NOTE: Your answer, or an excerpt thereof, may
be contaminated from a sick or dirty animal, asbe published in a forthcoming issue of the
well as by dirty living environments. "Think aboute-newsletter and on the website. By submitting
how many times a cow lays down in a field oryour answer you authorize this. Please include
the barn," says Tom Szalkucki, assistant directoryour name and your city state (or country)
of the Wisconsin Center for Dairy Research atlocation to be included in the publication of select
the University of Wisconsin-Madison. "Even if theanswers!This article was provided by the world's
barn is cleaned thoroughly and regularly, it's not#1 most popular and trusted holistic living
steamed. Contamination can take place becausee-newsletter -- FREE to you right now at The old
it's not a sterile environment." Pasteurization, saysway of thinking: "holistic living" pertains only to
the FDA, kills any dangerous bacteria while alsopersonal health. The new way of thinking: "holistic
destroying bacteria that can cause milk to spoil,living" means prevention of the negative and
thereby extending shelf life. One of the biggestadherence to the positive in all SIX practical areas
controversies over pasteurized milk is whether orof life: relationships, finances, career, home
not the milk is able to retain its nutritional valueenvironment, safety and health. With the
after the high temperatures it is exposed to.e-newsletter, you will get holistic wisdom from the
Proponents of pasteurization say the process hasworld's top experts in all six of these areas --
little effect on the milk's nutritional value or flavor.completely FREE with a simple sign-up (and a
"Milk is a good source of the vitamins thiamine,guaranteed no-spam policy!
folate, B-12, and riboflavin, and pasteurization